Scripture Daily

Context No. 1201 of 4322 · 1 Corinthians

Context · Reflection

1 Corinthians 13:1-7: in context

1If I speak with the languages of men and of angels, but don’t have love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but don’t have love, I am nothing. 3If I give away all my goods to feed the poor, and if I give my body to be burned, but don’t have love, it profits me nothing. 4Love is patient and is kind. Love doesn’t envy. Love doesn’t brag, is not proud, 5doesn’t behave itself inappropriately, doesn’t seek its own way, is not provoked, takes no account of evil; 6doesn’t rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; 7bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, and endures all things.

Paul interrupts his teaching on spiritual gifts to write the most famous passage on love. He piles up the greatest gifts and achievements, speaking in tongues of angels, prophecy, all knowledge, mountain-moving faith, giving away everything to the poor, even martyrdom, and after each one drops the same verdict: without love, it is nothing. Then he describes love itself: patient, kind, not envious or boastful or proud, not rude or self-seeking or easily angered, keeping no record of wrongs, not rejoicing in evil but in the truth, bearing, believing, hoping, and enduring all things.

The first thing Paul does is measure the most impressive spiritual accomplishments against love and find them worthless without it. Eloquence, prophecy, knowledge, even the faith that moves mountains and the sacrifice that gives the body to be burned, all of it is nothing, he says, if love is absent. That is a startling scale of values. We tend to rank the dramatic gifts highest, and Paul says the most spectacular gift without love is a clanging cymbal, noise. Love is not one virtue among the gifts; it is the thing that gives all the gifts their worth, and without it the greatest achievements amount to nothing. And then Paul does not define love abstractly but describes what it does and does not do, and every line is practical, checkable, unglamorous: patient, kind, not keeping score, not easily angered. It is worth reading the description slowly and honestly, putting your own name in place of the word love, and feeling how far short it falls. The chapter is not sentimental; it is a searching mirror. The most gifted person, without this patient, kind, unself-seeking love, is nothing, and love is measured not in feeling but in these daily, difficult behaviors.

If I put my own name where the word love stands, how far short do I fall, and do I believe Paul that even my greatest gifts are nothing without this patient, kind, self-forgetting love?

Sources