Scripture Daily

Context No. 1467 of 4322 · Luke

Context · Reflection

Luke 23:1-5: in context

1The whole company of them rose up and brought him before Pilate. 2They began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man perverting the nation, forbidding paying taxes to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” 3Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” He answered him, “So you say.” 4Pilate said to the chief priests and the multitudes, “I find no basis for a charge against this man.” 5But they insisted, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee even to this place.”

The council brings Jesus before Pilate and begins to accuse him. Their charges are calculated to alarm a Roman governor: we found this man subverting our nation, forbidding the payment of taxes to Caesar, and claiming to be Christ, a king. The charges are distortions; Jesus had in fact told the people to render to Caesar what was Caesar's. Pilate questions him briefly and declares, I find no basis for a charge against this man. But the accusers press harder, insisting that he stirs up the people with his teaching all through Judea, from Galilee to here.

What is striking is how the accusations twist the truth. Jesus is charged with forbidding taxes to Caesar, when he had said the opposite, render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's. His teaching about a kingdom not of this world is recast as a political claim to an earthly throne in rebellion against Rome. The charges are not outright inventions so much as distortions, his words and deeds bent and misrepresented to make him appear what he was not. And notice how Jesus responds, or rather how little he responds. To Pilate's question he gives only a spare word, and to the flood of false accusations he mostly keeps silent, not scrambling to refute every distortion, not fighting to clear his name point by point. He entrusts himself, as scripture says elsewhere, to the one who judges justly. There is something to learn here for the experience, painful and common, of being misrepresented, of having our words twisted and our motives recast to make us look like what we are not. The instinct is to fight every distortion, to correct the record furiously, to prove our innocence to everyone. Jesus, falsely accused before a governor who could kill him, did not do that. He answered what needed answering and left the rest, entrusting his vindication to God rather than exhausting himself against every lie. When we are falsely accused and misrepresented, we can do the same: answer what must be answered, and entrust the rest, and our vindication, to the God who judges justly and knows the truth.

When my words are twisted and I am misrepresented, made to look like what I am not, do I exhaust myself trying to refute every distortion, or can I, like Jesus before Pilate, answer what must be answered and entrust the rest and my vindication to the God who judges justly?

Sources