Scripture Daily

Context No. 1954 of 4322 · Exodus

Context · Reflection

Exodus 21:22-27: in context

22“If men fight and hurt a pregnant woman so that she gives birth prematurely, and yet no harm follows, he shall be surely fined as much as the woman’s husband demands and the judges allow. 23But if any harm follows, then you must take life for life, 24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25burning for burning, wound for wound, and bruise for bruise. 26“If a man strikes his servant’s eye, or his maid’s eye, and destroys it, he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake. 27If he strikes out his male servant’s tooth, or his female servant’s tooth, he shall let the servant go free for his tooth’s sake.

Among the laws of justice comes the famous principle: eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. If harm is done, the penalty is to match it, no more and no less. The passage also protects servants: if a master destroys his servant's eye or knocks out his tooth, the servant is to go free in compensation for the injury. The law measures justice, matching penalty to harm, and guards even the vulnerable servant from abuse.

The principle of eye for eye is often misunderstood as a license for revenge, but in its context it was the opposite: a limit on vengeance. Human beings, wronged, tend to escalate, to repay an injury with a greater injury, a slight with a blow, a blow with a killing. The law of eye for eye restrained this: the penalty was to match the harm, no more, an eye for an eye and not a life for an eye, a measured justice that limited retaliation to what was proportionate. It was a restraint on the human impulse to escalate revenge, a boundary that kept justice measured rather than letting it spiral into ever-greater vengeance. And then Jesus took this principle and carried it further, not backward toward more revenge but forward toward mercy. You have heard that it was said, an eye for an eye, he taught; but I tell you, do not resist the evil person; if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. Where the law limited revenge to the proportionate, Jesus called his followers beyond even proportionate retaliation, to non-retaliation, to absorbing the wrong rather than repaying it, to overcoming evil with good. This is a movement from limiting vengeance to renouncing it, from measured justice to grace. There is a challenge here for how we respond to being wronged. Even the measured justice of eye for eye is beyond us when our impulse is to escalate; but Jesus calls us further still, not to repay evil with evil at all, but to turn the other cheek, to leave vengeance to God, to overcome evil with good. Do not avenge yourselves, Scripture says; vengeance belongs to God. The law limited revenge to the proportionate; Christ calls us to lay it down entirely, trusting God with justice and answering evil with mercy. This is hard, and it is grace; but it is the way of Christ, who, when he was reviled, did not revile in return, but entrusted himself to the one who judges justly. From the limit on vengeance in eye for eye to the renunciation of vengeance in turning the other cheek, the movement is toward the mercy of God; and the followers of Christ are called not merely to measured revenge but to the grace that overcomes evil with good.

When I am wronged, is my impulse to escalate, to repay an injury with a greater one, and do I even manage the measured justice of eye for eye, and can I hear Christ's call beyond it, to turn the other cheek, to leave vengeance to God, and to overcome evil with good, moving from the limiting of revenge to the grace that renounces it?

Sources