Scripture Daily

Context No. 2240 of 4322 · Exodus

Context · Reflection

Exodus 22:6-13: in context

6“If fire breaks out, and catches in thorns so that the shocks of grain, or the standing grain, or the field are consumed; he who kindled the fire shall surely make restitution. 7“If a man delivers to his neighbor money or stuff to keep, and it is stolen out of the man’s house, if the thief is found, he shall pay double. 8If the thief isn’t found, then the master of the house shall come near to God, to find out whether or not he has put his hand on his neighbor’s goods. 9For every matter of trespass, whether it is for ox, for donkey, for sheep, for clothing, or for any kind of lost thing, about which one says, ‘This is mine,’ the cause of both parties shall come before God. He whom God condemns shall pay double to his neighbor. 10“If a man delivers to his neighbor a donkey, an ox, a sheep, or any animal to keep, and it dies or is injured, or driven away, no man seeing it; 11the oath of the LORD shall be between them both, he has not put his hand on his neighbor’s goods; and its owner shall accept it, and he shall not make restitution. 12But if it is stolen from him, the one who stole shall make restitution to its owner. 13If it is torn in pieces, let him bring it for evidence. He shall not make good that which was torn.

The law gives various cases about property and responsibility. If a fire someone kindles spreads and burns a neighbor's grain, the one who started the fire must make restitution. If goods entrusted for safekeeping are lost or stolen, the matter is brought before God to determine responsibility, and the one at fault makes it right. Throughout these laws runs a principle: when a person causes loss or damage to another, they are to make restitution, to restore what was lost, to take responsibility for the harm they caused.

The principle underlying these laws is restitution: those who cause harm are to make it right. The one who kindled the fire that spread must repay the damage; the one responsible for a loss must restore it. The law does not let harm be shrugged off, excused, or ignored; the one who caused it bears responsibility to make it right, to restore what was damaged or lost. Justice requires not merely admitting fault but making restitution, taking real responsibility for the harm done. This holds a principle that reaches into our own dealings. When we cause harm or loss to another, whether by carelessness, wrong, or the spreading of some fire we kindled, we bear a responsibility to make it right, to restore what we damaged, to repair the harm as far as we can. It is not enough to feel sorry or to admit fault; genuine responsibility makes restitution, taking real steps to repair the damage we caused rather than shrugging it off or leaving the other to bear the loss. When Zacchaeus was changed, he did not merely repent in feeling; he said, if I have defrauded anyone, I restore it fourfold. Real repentance for harm done makes restitution where it can. This searches how we respond to harm we have caused. When we have damaged, wronged, or caused loss to another, do we take responsibility to make it right, to restore and repair as far as we can, or do we shrug it off, excuse ourselves, and leave the other to bear the loss? The law requires restitution; genuine responsibility makes it. Owe no one anything, Paul says, except to love one another; and love that has caused harm seeks to repair it, to make restitution, to right the wrong. This calls us to take responsibility for the harm we cause and make it right. The law's principle of restitution holds us accountable: the one who caused the damage restores it. And we are called to the same, not merely admitting fault when we have harmed another, but making restitution where we can, taking real responsibility to repair the damage rather than leaving it for the other to bear. To make right the harm we have caused, restoring and repairing as far as lies in us, is the just and loving response to the loss we bring on others, and the mark of a genuine repentance that does not merely regret the harm but seeks to mend it.

When I have caused harm or loss to another, by carelessness, wrong, or some fire I kindled, do I take responsibility to make it right, restoring and repairing as far as I can, or do I shrug it off, excuse myself, and leave the other to bear the loss, and can the law's principle of restitution, together with Zacchaeus who restored fourfold, move me to a genuine responsibility that does not merely regret the harm I have done but seeks to mend it, making restitution where I can?

Sources