Scripture Daily

Context No. 441 of 4322 · 1 Maccabees

Context · Reflection

1 Maccabees 6:40-47: in context

40A part of the king’s army was spread upon the high hills and some on the low ground, and they went on firmly and in order. 41All who heard the noise of their multitude, the marching of the multitude, and the rattling of the weapons trembled; for the army was exceedingly great and strong. 42Judas and his army drew near for battle, and six hundred men of the king’s army fell. 43Eleazar, who was called Avaran, saw one of the animals armed with royal breastplates, and it was taller than all the animals, and the king seemed to be on it. 44He gave his life to deliver his people, and to get himself an everlasting name. 45He ran upon him courageously into the midst of the phalanx, and killed on the right hand and on the left, and they parted away from him on this side and on that. 46He crept under the elephant, and stabbed it from beneath, and killed it. The elephant fell to the earth upon him, and he died there. 47They saw the strength of the kingdom and the fierce attack of the army, and turned away from them.

This is a battle scene, and at its center is one man's spectacular, tragic act of courage. The Seleucid army is enormous and terrifying, complete with war elephants carrying armored towers, and the noise of its marching makes everyone tremble. In the middle of the fight, Eleazar, one of the Maccabee brothers, spots an elephant that is taller than all the rest and decked in royal armor, and he concludes that the king himself must be riding it. So he makes a decision. He gives his life, the text says plainly, to deliver his people and to win himself an everlasting name. He charges into the enemy phalanx, cutting his way through to the great elephant, gets underneath it, and stabs it from below. The elephant collapses, and it falls on top of him, and he dies there beneath it.

Now here is the honest, complicated part the text does not hide. The king was not on that elephant. Eleazar had guessed wrong. His heroic sacrifice, meant to decapitate the enemy army by killing its king, killed only an elephant, and the battle was not won by it; the very next line says the army saw the strength of the enemy and pulled back. So his death was genuinely brave, genuinely self-giving, offered for his people, and it was also based on a mistake and did not accomplish what he hoped. Scripture records all of it without turning the sacrifice into a clean, decisive victory. And yet it does not diminish him either. It says he gave his life for his people and won an everlasting name, and it names him forever, elephant and mistake and all.

That is worth sitting with, because I tend to measure the worth of sacrifice and effort almost entirely by results. If a costly thing I gave or risked for others did not work, I count it as wasted. Eleazar's story pushes back. His self-giving love was honored, and his name kept forever, even though his judgment was flawed and the sacrifice did not achieve its aim. Where have I written off some costly thing I gave for others as wasted because it did not succeed, when the giving of it may have been worthy in itself, mistaken and ineffective as it turned out to be?

Sources