Reflections

Reflection No. 3408 of 4322

Context · Reflection

Job 22:1-16: a reflection

1Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered, 2“Can a man be profitable to God? Surely he who is wise is profitable to himself. 3Is it any pleasure to the Almighty that you are righteous? Or does it benefit him that you make your ways perfect? 4Is it for your piety that he reproves you, that he enters with you into judgment? 5Isn’t your wickedness great? Neither is there any end to your iniquities. 6For you have taken pledges from your brother for nothing, and stripped the naked of their clothing. 7You haven’t given water to the weary to drink, and you have withheld bread from the hungry. 8But as for the mighty man, he had the earth. The honorable man, he lived in it. 9You have sent widows away empty, and the arms of the fatherless have been broken. 10Therefore snares are around you. Sudden fear troubles you, 11or darkness, so that you can not see, and floods of waters cover you. 12“Isn’t God in the heights of heaven? See the height of the stars, how high they are! 13You say, ‘What does God know? Can he judge through the thick darkness? 14Thick clouds are a covering to him, so that he doesn’t see. He walks on the vault of the sky.’ 15Will you keep the old way, which wicked men have trodden, 16who were snatched away before their time, whose foundation was poured out as a stream,

Convinced that Job's suffering must mean Job is guilty of great sin, Eliphaz proceeds to invent specific accusations to fit his theory, charging Job with sins for which there is no evidence. Isn't your wickedness great? he demands; and then he lists specific charges: that Job took pledges from the poor, stripped the naked, withheld bread from the hungry, sent widows away empty. But these were fabrications, invented to fit Eliphaz's conviction that Job's suffering proved him a great sinner; Job had done no such things. Rather than let the facts guide his conclusion, Eliphaz forced accusations to fit the conclusion he had already reached. This is a warning against manufacturing accusations to fit our theories about someone. Eliphaz invented charges to fit his theory of Job's guilt. Do not manufacture accusations to fit your conclusions. Forcing facts to fit our assumptions about someone is unjust. Beware inventing charges to support a conclusion already reached.

Notice the injustice of Eliphaz's method. He had concluded that Job's suffering must be punishment for great sin; his theory required Job to be guilty. And so, rather than let the evidence guide him, or admit he did not know why Job suffered, he manufactured specific accusations to fit his theory, charging Job with oppressing the poor and the widow, though Job had done no such things. He worked backward from his conclusion, inventing the charges his theory needed. This is a real injustice, and a real danger for us. When we have decided someone must be guilty, or must be a certain way, we can begin to force the facts to fit, reading their actions in the worst light, inventing or assuming faults that fit our conclusion, rather than judging fairly by the evidence. This does great injustice to others, condemning them for what they have not done, simply because it fits our assumptions. We do well to guard against this, to judge fairly by the evidence rather than manufacturing accusations to fit conclusions we have already reached about someone. Do not force the facts to fit your assumptions about someone. Manufacturing accusations to fit our theories does great injustice. Judge fairly by the evidence, not by conclusions already reached. Beware condemning others for what fits our theory, not what they have done.

That is worth taking to heart, for manufacturing accusations to fit our theories about someone does great injustice, and we do well to judge fairly rather than force the facts to fit our conclusions, as Eliphaz invented charges against Job to fit his assumption of Job's guilt. We can decide someone must be guilty or must be a certain way, and then force the facts to fit, inventing or assuming faults that suit our conclusion; but Eliphaz charged Job with sins he had not committed, working backward from his theory. This is unjust. Do not manufacture accusations to fit your conclusions about someone; judge fairly by the evidence. Judge others fairly by the evidence rather than manufacturing accusations to fit conclusions you have already reached, as Eliphaz, convinced that Job's suffering must mean Job was a great sinner, invented specific charges to fit his theory, accusing Job of oppressing the poor and the widow though Job had done no such things; for when we have decided that someone must be guilty or must be a certain way, we can begin to force the facts to fit, reading their actions in the worst light and inventing or assuming faults that suit our conclusion rather than judging fairly by the evidence, which does great injustice to others, condemning them for what they have not done simply because it fits our assumptions, so that we do well to guard against this and to judge fairly by the evidence rather than working backward from conclusions we have already reached about someone.

Lord, convinced that Job's suffering must mean Job is guilty of great sin, Eliphaz proceeds to invent specific accusations to fit his theory, charging Job with sins for which there is no evidence. Isn't your wickedness great? he demands; and then he lists specific charges, that Job took pledges from the poor, withheld bread from the hungry, sent widows away empty. But these were fabrications, invented to fit Eliphaz's conviction that Job's suffering proved him a great sinner; Job had done no such things. Rather than let the facts guide his conclusion, Eliphaz forced accusations to fit the conclusion he had already reached. This is a warning against manufacturing accusations to fit my theories about someone. Show me the injustice of Eliphaz's method. He had concluded that Job's suffering must be punishment for great sin; his theory required Job to be guilty. And so, rather than let the evidence guide him, he manufactured specific accusations to fit his theory. He worked backward from his conclusion, inventing the charges his theory needed. This is a real injustice, and a real danger for me. When I have decided someone must be guilty, or must be a certain way, I can begin to force the facts to fit, reading their actions in the worst light, inventing or assuming faults that fit my conclusion, rather than judging fairly. This does great injustice to others. Take that to my heart, for manufacturing accusations to fit my theories about someone does great injustice. Keep me from forcing the facts to fit my assumptions about someone, or inventing charges to support a conclusion I have already reached; help me judge others fairly by the evidence, Lord, as Eliphaz did not with Job, rather than condemning them for what fits my theory instead of what they have actually done.